Bu sayfa hakkındaki yorumlar:
Yorumu gönderen: London flight( invodent medserwis.pl ), 08.07.2012, 20:37 (UTC):
So an interesting follow up article to read is this I don’t agree with the sentiments in this – it is talking about bricks and mortar businesses selling tangible products over have a presence as an artist on the web.I think a Theatre Company should have a website, but an individual artist doesn’t need one, so it depends on your personal preference, but please do take in both sides.
|
Yorumu gönderen: accutane( 321651558qq.com ), 13.06.2012, 01:40 (UTC):
This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.
|
Yorumu gönderen: Samir( infobawialniamadagaskar.pl ), 06.06.2012, 04:18 (UTC):
Insanity.I'm a web developer, so I have a veetsd interest in this topic, but I can't imagine why any company would want to do such a thing.Your first point about the benefits of Facebook pages is irrelevant with regard to making that page your home page, because the benefits you get from having a Facebook page aren't mutually exclusive. If a Facebook user is already a fan of your company, they're getting your updates regardless. Making that page your homepage might get you more fans more quickly, sure, but you're effectively saying the only way someone can participate with you is through social media. That's just silly.Your point about the resources to build a web presence is valid, but at the same time, not. It doesn't cost anything to have a Facebook page, so while it certainly makes sense for most businesses to have them, it makes little if any sense to make that page a company's home page. What if your company has to offer downloads like support materials? What if your company deals with confidential information, as lawyers do? I wouldn't want to do business with a company that doesn't have the time or resources to have a quality website. If I punch in yourcoolbusiness.com and end up on a Facebook page, I'm going to assume you took the easy way out. I don't want to do business with a company that lacks the resources to put together a quality website.I'm not sure how your last argument is even relevant to the discussion. Yes, Facebook marketing is effective, both in terms of cost and in terms of conversions. So what? Does making your Facebook page your company home page have any effect on the effectiveness of your advertising *on* Facebook?I agree that Facebook is a great resource for companies and marketers, but putting all you eggs in one basket is always a bad move (unless it's Vegas and you just *know* the next card in the deck will give you 21).It wasn't long ago that MySpace was the dominant, and Facebook was but an ant. It wasn't long before that when Livejournal was in Myspace's position. These applications come and go. Facebook, like Twitter, has yet to make any real money. Why would you put the public-facing first-stop for your company on the web in the hands of such an ephemeral industry? |
|
medserwis.pl ), 
